SLOs tied to user journeys
Availability of endpoints is not availability of your product. SLOs written against what the user is trying to do, with error budgets that inform release cadence.
Signal that survives 3 AM. Postmortems that end in code changes, not blame.
SLOs and error budgets your product team helps set, dashboards a CFO can read, on-call rotations with clear ownership, and blameless postmortems that actually change the codebase. Cost and reliability treated as the same conversation, not siloed OKRs.
Availability of endpoints is not availability of your product. SLOs written against what the user is trying to do, with error budgets that inform release cadence.
One vendor-neutral instrumentation across languages. When you change backends, you're not rewriting instrumentation for three months.
Rotations sized for the incident load, runbooks that pass a real drill, and a paging discipline that treats false positives as bugs.
The template is the easy part. The habit that turns action items into shipped code is what separates practice from theater.
The cheapest way to make a system reliable is often to remove things. Cost signals in the reliability conversation, and vice versa.
Game days for the top failure modes, DR drills that actually flip traffic, load tests before Black Friday — not after.
The words that separate insiders from readers.
'Correctness' isn't a percentile of a p95. What replaces it as a shipping gate is unresolved.
OpenTelemetry works. The operational cost of running your own pipeline vs. paying a vendor is where teams still hesitate.
Adding a region for 9s vs. cutting spend by removing them. Framing the tradeoff is often harder than the engineering.
The staffing story more than the technology story. Rotations that don't burn people out are still an open problem.
Action items decay. The systems that keep them alive — and closed — are what separate mature teams from performative ones.